Re: Re(2): thoughts on domes and markets
- To: domesteading at sculptors dot com
- Subject: Re: Re(2): thoughts on domes and markets
- From: ozzyman at vnet dot net
- Date: Mon, 11 Jan 1999 14:01:01 -0500 (EST)
- In-reply-to: <369A45D8.5DD3@domes.com> from "Oregon Dome" at Jan 11, 99 10:41:28 am
> Michael Rowland wrote:
> > I wonder if that fellow would be as spleened-out about a
> > "conventionally-built" house that just happened to have a
> > mutually-symmetrical 5-vaulted, compositely-gambrelled roof and no
> > internal load-bearing walls...?
> We always tell folks to tell the bank that they are building a three
> bedroom, two bath home (or whatever it is that they are doing) and let
> the bank find out that it is a dome when you deliver the plans. We're
> not trying to be sneaky, but get past the first person that people talk
> to, who is usually there just to screen people out of the loan process.
Yeah, and they do a pretty darn good job of it too from what I have heard.
After pulling that little "end run" have you ever had a bank refuse financing
based solely(sp?) on the type of structure?
This archive was generated by a fusion of
Pipermail 0.09 (Mailman edition) and