Re: Re(2): thoughts on domes and markets

> Michael Rowland wrote:
> <snip>
> > I wonder if that fellow would be as spleened-out about a
> > "conventionally-built" house that just happened to have a
> > mutually-symmetrical 5-vaulted, compositely-gambrelled roof and no
> > internal load-bearing walls...?
> <snip>
> We always tell folks to tell the bank that they are building a three
> bedroom, two bath home (or whatever it is that they are doing) and let
> the bank find out that it is a dome when you deliver the plans.  We're
> not trying to be sneaky, but get past the first person that people talk
> to, who is usually there just to screen people out of the loan process.

Yeah, and they do a pretty darn good job of it too from what I have heard.

After pulling that little "end run" have you ever had a bank refuse financing
based solely(sp?) on the type of structure?


This archive was generated by a fusion of Pipermail 0.09 (Mailman edition) and MHonArc 2.6.8.