Re: spectacular and serene
- To: domesteading at sculptors dot com
- Subject: Re: spectacular and serene
- From: Ted Ledbetter <tedled at earthlink dot net>
- Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2001 15:21:13 -0600
- In-reply-to: <20010114.112230.1212.0.c.knight@juno.com>
>> >> earth-sheltered housing. I joined this list because of the
>
>> >Fantastic! My personal favorite structure is a tension structure,
>> >actually a simple one -- the radial tent. But, you've got to
>>
>> an earth-sheltered reinforced-concrete dome because i believe that
>> a dome shape is the strongest form to be able to support an earthen
>> "roof" and to support any animal or vehicular traffic across an
>> earthen-roof...am i wrong about this?
>
>Actually, domes and tension structures are comparable in strength
>and load bearing capacities, but the translucent nature of the tension
>structure makes it better suited to above ground use. You don't even
>require windows, unless you want a view. The light that comes
>through them is wonderful. (a local shopping mall uses them in lieu
>of artificial light...beautiful, and functional)
>
>That, and the fact that it's inherently more "flexible" than a concrete
>reinforced dome, probably makes the dome better suited to
>underground homes.
>
>As far as I know, earth sheltered structures require enormous strength
>to support the earth *AND* enormous rigidity so that the earth above
>does not move.
>
>Of course, my own ideas lean towards an earth bermed structure with
>a tension roof.
>
> -- Chuck Knight
>________________________________________________________________
chuck,
...can you point me to a webpage or two that will show me examples of the
flexible translucent tension structures that your're mentioning?
ted
This archive was generated by a fusion of
Pipermail 0.09 (Mailman edition) and
MHonArc 2.6.8.